Skip to main content
AI-Assisted Product Research Funnel

Wiki · How it works

The product research funnel, explained

This page walks through the whole funnel: every checkpoint, what each number means, and how it's calculated. No black boxes. If you can't explain a score in your own words, the tool has failed you.

Before you start: estimates only

Every number this tool outputs is an estimate.

Niche scores, revenue figures, search volumes, competitor Best Sellers Rank — none of these are exact. They're directional signals derived from public Amazon data and proven seller methodologies. They're good enough for product research and go/no-go decisions; they're not good enough to forecast actual income or promise specific results. Treat them like a doctor treats a symptom check: useful indicators, not a diagnosis.

The full funnel at a glance

A product idea has to survive a 5-phase, 23-checkpoint funnel before it's worth your money. Each phase asks a tougher question than the last, and a candidate flows through them in order. The famous Market Dominator scan is one checkpoint in here (checkpoint #5, competition level); the rest test demand, opportunity, and the legal and physical barriers to selling.

Phase 1 · Demand FactorRight size & price ($25–$100)Kill gate: #1Phase 2 · CompetitivenessCan a newcomer rank? (Market Dominator = #5)Kill gates: #2, #5Phase 3 · OpportunityReturns, margin, ROI, differentiationKill gates: #9, #18, #19Phase 4 · Barrier to EntryCompliance, patents, dangerous goodsKill gates: #20, #21, #22Phase 5 · ResultGo / No-go verdict
A candidate flows top to bottom through 23 checkpoints across 5 phases. Most checkpoints only flag caution; the red kill gates are the ones where a fail stops the funnel cold (entrenched competition, sub-30% margin, a blocking patent, and the like).
  1. Phase 1 · Demand Factor. Is there a real, profitable-size market for this product?
  2. Phase 2 · Competitiveness. Can a new seller realistically break into the search results?
  3. Phase 3 · Opportunity. Returns, conversion, seasonality, budget, differentiation, and the money (margin and ROI).
  4. Phase 4 · Barrier to Entry. Compliance, restrictions, patents, and dangerous-goods gates.
  5. Phase 5 · Result. The overall go / no-go verdict.

How the funnel decides

It's a funnel, not a scorecard. The checkpoints aren't averaged into one number; a candidate is walked through them in order and each one returns a verdict.

Pass

Clears the bar. Move on.

Caution

Enterable, but with a plan and open eyes.

Fail

Below the bar for this checkpoint.

Kill gates short-circuit the funnel.

Some checkpoints are hard gates: a fail there is a hard stop, no matter how good everything else looks. The classic kill gates are an off-band price (#1), Amazon or one brand owning the page (#2), an entrenched dominator in the scan (#5), a high return ratio (#9), margin under 30% (#18), ROI under 100% (#19), a missing compliance certification (#20/#21), and a blocking patent (#22). Everything else lands at caution so you can weigh it yourself.

The tool fills in what it can automatically (from a Market Dominator scan or live Amazon data) and asks you for the judgement calls. Each checkpoint below is tagged with where its answer comes from: Computed for you computed for you, Your call your call, or Amazon data from Amazon's own data.

Phase 1 · Demand Factor

The first question is the cheapest to answer and the easiest to get wrong: is this even the right kind of product? One checkpoint decides it.

  • 1

    Retail price & FBA size

    Kill gateComputed for you

    Roughly $25–$100 retail price, in a small/large standard FBA size tier.

    Auto-estimated from the linked scan: the niche's competitor median price and FBA size tier. Off-band price (e.g. the "$20 check") fails; oversize or high-capital (>$100) products are flagged. Edit to your own planned price/size.

Phase 2 · Competitiveness

Now the hard part for a newcomer: can you actually get seen? Seven checkpoints, and the Market Dominator scan (checkpoint #5) is the engine behind most of them. The sections after this one unpack exactly how that scan works.

  • 2

    Brand / 1st-party dominance

    Kill gateYour call

    Is Amazon or a single brand dominating the page? Dominated = fail.

    Uses the themarkup methodology for spotting Amazon/own-brand dominance in search results.

    Reference ↗
  • 3

    Design vs utility

    Your call

    Design-oriented, utility-oriented, or both — state the lean.

    Products can have both elements; note which way it leans, since it changes how you differentiate.

  • 4

    Top clicked products

    Amazon data

    Products taking 90% of clicks: <25 very good · 26–50 good · 51–75 caution · 75+ consider again.

    From Amazon Product Opportunity Explorer (Professional plan). Fewer products capturing the clicks = more concentrated, more winnable.

  • 5

    Competition level (Market Dominator)

    Kill gateComputed for you

    Super Weak → Super Strong. Super Strong / entrenched dominator = fail.

    Computed from a Market Dominator scan: the reverse-ASIN keyword × competitor matrix and the 0–100 niche score. Link or run a scan to fill this automatically.

  • 6

    Data anomaly check

    Computed for you

    Does the data make sense? e.g. low click-share but high sales, or high share but low sales.

    A sanity pass on the scan output. Flag anything that contradicts itself before trusting the read.

  • 7

    Keyword quality score

    Computed for you

    # keywords with Significance > 7: ≥50 very good · ≥25 good · <25 caution · <10 careful.

    Auto-counted from your linked scan: keywords where 80%+ of competitors rank on page 1 — the niche's must-rank core (the matrix's "Significance"). No Helium10 needed.

  • 8

    Keyword count

    Computed for you

    Total ranking keywords between 100 and 300.

    Computed from the linked Market Dominator scan (the goldilocks keyword count).

Checkpoints #5, #6, #7, and #8 all read from a single Market Dominator scan. Here's what that scan does and how its 0–100 score is built.

What the Market Dominator scan asks

You're evaluating whether a niche is worth entering. The question the scan answers: how dominant are the top 10 competitors across this niche's most important keywords?

If the top 10 sellers control most of the demand (most page-1 rankings, most search-volume share), the niche is entrenched and a new entrant will burn cash trying to break in. If page-1 rankings are scattered across many smaller players, you've found an opening worth investing in.

The output is a single 0–100 score with a traffic-light grade and a per-competitor breakdown showing exactly who's dominant and why.

Scan workflow at a glance

1Pick a nichee.g. hammock chair2Find 10 ASINsPaste or search3ScanPulls all keywords4Tune filtersLive, no extra credits5Export to PLSRun the simulator
  1. Pick a candidate niche. Usually a keyword like hammock camping chair or silicone baking mat.
  2. Find 10 competitors. Two ways:
    • Paste ASINs — open Amazon, search the niche keyword, grab the top 10 organic ASINs by hand. Works with raw ASINs (B08D8CM3TJ) or full Amazon URLs.
    • Search by keyword — let the tool fetch the top ~48 results and pick 10 visually from a card grid sorted by estimated revenue. Lets you filter by design and type rather than just rank.
  3. Scan. The tool pulls every keyword each of the 10 ASINs ranks for, unions them into a single keyword × ASIN matrix, and applies the Market Dominator scoring methodology.
  4. Tune filters live. On the results page, adjust Min Search Volume and Page-1 threshold to land in the Market Dominator sweet spot of 100–300 keywords. No extra credits charged — filtering is local.
  5. Export to Product Launch Simulator. Send the niche straight into the Simulator (one click), or download the xlsx, to run the full Monte Carlo launch simulation.

An independent read, built for your go/no-go decision

You might notice a search volume here reads differently from Cerebro (Helium10) or Jungle Scout for the same keyword. That is expected, and it works in your favor. This tool is a fully independent read on the niche, purpose-built for one job: the go/no-go call.

Real Amazon shopper demandAmazon never publishes exact volumes — every tool estimates itThis toolMarket Dominator methodologyHelium10 · Cerebroown pipeline + modelJungle Scoutown panel + modelSV ≈ 5,900SV ≈ 8,400SV ≈ 4,100Same keyword → three different volume estimates. This is expected, not a bug.What stays stable across all threethe verdict (Open / Caution / Entrenched) and who actually ranks on page 1
One hidden ground truth, three independent reads. The raw volume numbers won't line up; the go/no-go verdict does, and that is what this tool is built to get right.

Amazon does not publish absolute keyword search volumes to anyone. Every research tool infers them from its own inputs and its own model:

  • Helium10 (Cerebro) is built largely on Amazon's Brand Analytics data plus its own clickstream and modeling.
  • Jungle Scout uses Amazon data plus its own sales panel and algorithm.
  • This tool reads live Amazon keyword and rank data and runs it through the transparent Market Dominator methodology, with every step of the math shown.

All three are independent estimates of the same hidden reality, so the raw volume numbers will not line up. Helium10 and Jungle Scout disagree with each other by 2–3× on the same keyword just as often. That is not a defect in any of them. It is the nature of estimating a number Amazon keeps private, and it is why a second independent read has value.

Why this is the read to decide on

Helium10 and Jungle Scout hand you a number and leave the judgment to you. This tool hands you the judgment with every step of the math shown: a fixed volume floor, then relative, structural signals such as which competitors rank on page 1, for how many keywords, and how concentrated that coverage is. Those signals barely move when the raw volumes differ, so the verdict (Open / Caution / Entrenched) is stable across data sources. It is calibrated for exactly the go/no-go decision this funnel makes, not a general-purpose keyword report.

So use this as your primary niche read. If one keyword's exact volume is decision-critical, cross-check that single number against Helium10, Jungle Scout, or Amazon directly. The most reliable cross-check of all is rank, not volume. Whether a competitor actually shows on page 1 for a keyword is something you can confirm yourself by searching Amazon.

The Market Dominator scoring methodology

The score is computed in five mechanical steps. No machine learning, no opinions — just the same arithmetic you can do by hand.

1

Filter keywords to the meaningful ones

Drop any keyword with monthly search volume below the threshold (default 350). This filter eliminates long-tail noise that would dilute the score. We call 350 the "business-worthy demand floor" — keywords below it don't move enough units to matter for niche-level competition.

2

Decide what counts as "on page 1"

For each surviving keyword and each of the 10 competitors, check the competitor's organic rank. A rank below 45 (the default page-1 threshold) means that competitor is visible to shoppers searching that keyword. Anything ≥ 45 is invisible buried-in-results territory.

50 organic search results#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#11#12#13#14#15#16#17#18#19#20#21#22#23#24#25#26#27#28#29#30#31#32#33#34#35#36#37#38#39#40#41#42#43#44#45#46#47#48#49#50Green (rank < 45): counts as "on page 1" for scoring
Amazon shows ~48 organic results on page 1. We use a strict cutoff at rank 45 so the first ~7/8 of the page counts as visible territory.
3

Compute the "Avg %" for each competitor

For each of the 10 competitors, calculate two ratios:

  • % of keywords on page 1 = page-1 keyword count ÷ total keywords
  • % of search volume on page 1 = sum of search volume for page-1 keywords ÷ total search volume

Avg % = (% keywords + % search volume) ÷ 2. This single number captures both breadth (how many keywords they reach) and weight (how much of the actual demand sits on those keywords).

% of Keywords on Page 1keywords on page 1total keywordsmeasures breadth% of Search Volume on Page 1search volume on page 1total search volumemeasures weight+Average % = (% keywords + % search volume) ÷ 2→ drives the competitor's bucket
Each competitor's Average % captures both how many keywords they reach (breadth) and how much actual search demand sits on those keywords (weight).
4

Bucket each competitor

The Avg % maps each competitor into one of five tiers, with a signed weight:

0–20%Super Weakweight +521–40%Weakweight +341–60%Normalweight 061–80%Strongweight −381–100%Super Strongweight −5Average %
Each competitor lands in one of five tiers based on their average page-1 dominance. Weights sum across the 10 competitors to produce the niche score.
Avg %BucketWeight
0–20%Super Weak+5
21–40%Weak+3
41–60%Normal0
61–80%Strong−3
81–100%Super Strong−5

Bucket boundaries are inclusive on the left and exclusive on the right — so 20.0% is Weak, not Super Weak.

5

Sum the weights → 0–100 niche score

Add the 10 competitor weights together. The sum lives in the range −50 to +50. Add 50 to shift it onto a friendlier 0–100 scale and clamp at the edges:

niche_score = clamp(sum(weights) + 50, 0, 100)

Interpretation:

  • 100 = all 10 competitors are Super Weak. Wide-open niche.
  • 50 = all Normal. Neutral.
  • 0 = all Super Strong. Fully entrenched.
0–33 Entrenched34–66 Caution67–100 Open025507510067Example: score 67 → Open
Niche score on a 0–100 scale. The traffic-light grade (Entrenched / Caution / Open) is read directly off this band, so the chip always matches the score. A single dominant rival (or a coordinated pair) triggers the max-penalty override, which clamps the score itself to 0 — the chip then follows that.

The max-penalty override

A single dominant rival or a coordinated pair can drown out an otherwise healthy-looking niche. The methodology has an override for this:

If either of these is true, the effective score clamps to 0:

  • ≥ 1 Super Strong competitor present, OR
  • ≥ 2 Strong competitors present
10 competitorsSSSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWRaw weights: −5 + 9×5 = +40→ Raw score: 40 + 50 = 90 (would look Open!)But override fires (≥1 Super Strong present):Effective score: 0 (Entrenched)
Even with 9 weak rivals, a single dominant leader (e.g. Anker in chargers) clamps the effective score to 0. The methodology recognizes that anchored leaders are unenterable regardless of how weak the rest of the field looks.

The raw score is still shown so you can see what the math would have said. The effective score is what should drive your decision — because in practice, a single anchored leader (think Anker in a charger niche) makes the niche unenterable regardless of how weak the other 9 sellers look.

The traffic-light grade

The Market Dominator blueprint sorts every competitor into a 5-grade scale based on how much of the niche they dominate:

Super Weak0–20%weight +5Open territoryWeak21–40%weight +3Beatable rivalNormal41–60%weight 0Established playerStrong61–80%weight −3Dominant rivalSuper Strong81–100%weight −5Entrenched leader
The 5-tier Market Dominator scale, from Super Weak to Super Strong. Each of the 10 competitors in your scan lands in one of these tiers — their combined weights produce the 0–100 niche score.

The per-niche grade chip on the results page comes straight from the 0–100 niche score, so the chip and the number can never disagree:

  • Green (Open): score 67–100. No entrenched dominator; a real opening.
  • Orange (Caution): score 34–66. Contested but enterable with a clear plan.
  • Red (Entrenched): score 0–33. Crowded; high risk for a new seller.

The genuine "one anchored giant" case is handled by the max-penalty override (above): if a Super Strong competitor is present, or two Strong ones, the effective score is clamped to 0, which lands in the Red band. So a niche with a single dominant rival still reads Red by the score itself, not by a separate hidden rule. This is the exact scoring the Product Launch Simulator uses, so a niche never changes grade when you export it.

Filters on the results page (and why they don't cost a credit)

When you submit a scan, the tool fetches every keyword every competitor ASIN ranks for and stores the full matrix. The filters on the results page are applied client-side against that full matrix — no extra API calls, no extra cost.

0100300600RED-SHIFTEDcompetitors appearfalsely STRONGERSWEET SPOTscore is calibratedto the methodologyGREEN-SHIFTEDcompetitors appearfalsely WEAKER220your scanKeyword count after search-volume filterUnder 100 kw: a few high-rank rivals dominate the dataset → score reads harder than reality.Over 300 kw: long-tail noise dilutes the buckets → score reads easier than reality.
Both extremes produce false positives in opposite directions. The 100–300 sweet spot is where the bucket math is calibrated. Adjust Min Search Volume live on the results page to land your scan in the green band.

Two filters are exposed:

  • Minimum Search Volume (default 350) — the search-volume floor for keywords to count. The Market Dominator methodology is calibrated for the 100–300 keyword band. Outside that band, the score is biased in opposite directions:
    • Under 100 keywords: a handful of high-rank rivals dominate the dataset → competitors appear falsely stronger than they really are (the score is red-shifted).
    • Over 300 keywords: irrelevant long-tail dilutes the buckets → competitors appear falsely weaker than they really are (the score is green-shifted).
  • Page-1 rank threshold (default 45) — what rank counts as "on page 1." 45 matches Amazon's usual page-1 result count. Rarely worth changing.

A blue Modified badge appears whenever your live filters differ from the auto-fit, with a one-click reset.

Auto-fit to the sweet spot, on load.

The page opens with the SV floor already tuned to land your contested-core count inside 100–300 — no button click needed. If the saved snapshot was scored at a different SV, you can still Reset to saved snapshot from the controls. Drag the slider any time to explore.

The keyword search picker

The "Search by keyword" tab is an alternative way to gather the 10 ASINs. You type a niche keyword, and the tool fetches the top ~48 Amazon products with all the metadata you need to choose visually: thumbnails, prices, ratings, review counts, and an estimated monthly revenue.

Sort defaults to estimated revenue, but you can switch to past-month sales, reviews, price, rating, or Amazon's own search-results rank. Hide sponsored toggle is on by default (you're looking for organic competition). Minimum review count filter weeds out brand-new listings with no traction signal yet.

When you've picked your 10, click Continue with 10 selected — they get pre-filled into the paste tab so you can review before submitting the actual scan.

The revenue estimate, demystified

The "Est. revenue" figure on each product card is the most accurate revenue signal we can produce. We use two methods and pick whichever applies to each listing.

Why two methods? Amazon shows an "X bought in the past month" badge on products with consistent recent demand — this is real sales data straight from Amazon, and we use it when it's available (~40-60% of listings). For the rest, we fall back to a Best Sellers Rank + category curve, which is how every mainstream Amazon-research tool estimates revenue when actual sales data isn't exposed.

Method 1: past-month sales × price (preferred)

When a listing carries Amazon's "X bought in the past month" badge, we read that number directly and multiply by the listed price:

monthly_revenue ≈ bought_past_month × price

A label of "from past-month sales" appears under the revenue figure when this method is used. Amazon only shows the badge for products with stable recent demand, which is why this method covers a minority of listings.

Method 2: Best Sellers Rank + category curve (fallback)

When Amazon doesn't expose past-month sales, we look up the ASIN's Best Sellers Rank in its top-level Amazon category and run it through a per-category sales curve:

InputSellers Ranke.g. #1,247 in SportsInputPricee.g. $89.99Step 1: Lookup curveSellers Rank + category→ sales / day(e.g. 12 units/day)Step 2: Multiplysales/day × 30 × price12 × 30 × $89.99Output (estimate)≈ $32K / month
Revenue is an estimate, not a quote. The sales-per-day curve is a category-aware reference; actual revenue depends on promos, returns, and velocity changes no third-party tool can see.
  1. Fetch the ASIN's Best Sellers Rank and the category it ranks in (Home & Kitchen, Sports & Outdoors, etc.).
  2. Map the Best Sellers Rank onto that category's sales-per-day curve, then multiply by 30 days and the listed price: monthly_revenue ≈ sales_per_day × 30 × price.

The curves are industry-standard reference data — "a Best Sellers Rank of 1,500 in Home & Kitchen typically sells about 300 units/day" — fitted from sampled real Amazon sales data. They're the same shape every mainstream Amazon-research tool uses under the hood. A label of "from Best Sellers Rank #X,XXX" appears under the revenue figure when this method is used.

Both methods are estimates. The past-month-sales method is much more accurate — it's Amazon's own data — but it's only directionally precise (Amazon rounds the number, so "500+ bought" could mean 500–700). The Best Sellers Rank method is statistical, so it's good for relative ranking but the absolute number can be off by a factor of 2 either way. Use either for order-of-magnitude sanity checks and for ranking competitors against each other. Don't quote either as fact.

Try it: Best Sellers Rank → estimated sales

Estimate only
Sales / day
248
Monthly units
7,442
Est. monthly revenue
$223,259
0.101101001k10k1001k10k100k1M10M100MBest Sellers Rank (log scale)Sales / dayRank #1,500248/d
Curve fitted from sampled real Amazon Best-Sellers-Rank vs sales data for the Home & Kitchen category. Both axes are log-scaled because the rank-to-sales relationship is approximately power-law. The marker shows where your inputs sit on the curve.

Estimate only. Real sales depend on promotions, returns, velocity changes, and many factors no third-party tool can see. Use this for product research and relative comparisons — not as an income forecast.

Phase 3 · Opportunity

The product is enterable. Is it worth it? Eleven checkpoints on returns, conversion, seasonality, the cost to rank, your differentiation plan, and the money: margin and ROI are both kill gates.

  • 9

    Return ratio

    Kill gateAmazon data

    <5% good · 5–7.5% caution · ≥7.5% bad.

    From Amazon Product Opportunity Explorer (Professional plan). A high return ratio erodes margin and signals a product problem.

  • 10

    Avg search conversion %

    Amazon data

    Note the benchmark — your future listing must beat this conversion rate.

    From Product Opportunity Explorer. Informational: it sets the bar your listing has to clear.

  • 11

    Top-3 keyword metrics

    Amazon data

    360-day SV, CVR, and CPC for the top 3 keywords. CPC target < $1.

    SV = search volume, CVR = conversion rate, CPC = cost-per-click for ads. CPC at or above $1 makes ranking expensive.

  • 12

    Seasonality

    Your call

    Consistently seasonal, trendy, or year-round — note the window.

    A sharply seasonal or trend product changes inventory and launch timing risk.

  • 13

    Budget calculation

    Computed for you

    Cost-to-rank budget, run at Stage 1 (pre-differentiation) and Stage 2 (post-differentiation).

    Uses the workbook cost-to-rank model: top-keyword search volume → ad clicks → CPR → spend to reach page 1 in 8 days → cost per day. Too high = "High Capital".

  • 14

    Differentiation — negatives to improve

    Your call

    ≥3 negatives mined from competitor reviews, each with a concrete action.

    What buyers complain about across competitors, and how your product will fix each one.

  • 15

    Differentiation — positives to keep

    Your call

    ≥3 positives from competitor reviews, each with how to protect it.

    What buyers love that you must not lose when you change the product.

  • 16

    Differentiation — bundling options

    Your call

    Value-add items you could bundle to stand out.

  • 17

    Retail price

    Your call

    Launch price vs desired (final) retail price.

    Margin and ROI are usually checked at both the launch price and the desired price.

  • 18

    Profit margin

    Kill gateComputed for you

    Must exceed 30%.

    Computed from retail price, COGS, and Amazon fees (FBA + referral). Below 30% kills the product.

  • 19

    ROI

    Kill gateComputed for you

    Must exceed 100%.

    Return on the per-unit cost. Below 100% kills the product.

One paste fills #4 / #9 / #10 / #11 — text or screenshot.

The POE pack at the top of the funnel accepts either a copy-pasted POE table (Niche Details + Search Terms) or a screenshot pasted with Ctrl/⌘+V. The AI reads either and fills four checkpoints in one go — including the top-3 keyword metrics (SV + CVR) for #11. CPC still comes from Amazon Ads.

Budget #13 is two-phase.

Phase 1 (pre-differentiation) = first-order inventory (competitor daily velocity × first-order days × COGS) + the launch ad push (CPR × CPC ÷ CVR over 8 days). Phase 2 (post-differentiation) = Phase 1 plus the one-time costs of the differentiation and bundling ideas you choose to ship. Each idea is a tick-box; the AI pre-fills a rough cost estimate when it generates the idea.

Phase 4 · Barrier to Entry

The last gates before you commit money: anything that could legally or physically block you from selling. The tool surfaces the likely requirements; you confirm them against your own account, since gating can differ seller to seller.

  • 20

    Compliance check

    Kill gateAmazon data

    Any certifications or regulatory restrictions required to sell?

    Check Seller Central restricted-products references before committing.

    Reference ↗
  • 21

    Dummy listing

    Kill gateAmazon data

    Does Amazon suppress the listing as restricted? What certification is needed?

    Create a dummy listing to see if Amazon flags the product as restricted, and what proof it asks for.

  • 22

    Patent check

    Kill gateYour call

    Is there a patent protecting the design or your planned differentiation?

    A blocking patent on the design or your differentiation is a hard stop.

  • 23

    Dangerous goods check

    Your call

    Battery, meltables, paint, or anything needing a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)?

    Hazmat classification adds cost, storage limits, and supplier requirements.

Patent search (#22) fans out across your top niche keywords.

Long-tail product names almost never match patent titles, so the search uses the top-3 keywords from #11 (the canonical language US patents are titled in). Up to 5 terms search in parallel against USPTO PatentsView; results are deduped by patent number and sorted newest-first. The AI then triages whether anything plausibly blocks the niche or your planned differentiation — verdict #22 stays Caution regardless, because clearance is a lawyer's call.

Phase 5 · Result — the go / no-go

Every checkpoint rolls up into one call. The funnel walks the phases in order: the moment a kill gate fails, the verdict is No-go and the rest is moot. If nothing fails, the status reflects how many checkpoints are still at caution versus cleared.

The AI go/no-go capstone is advice, not the verdict.

On demand, the tool can read every filled checkpoint and write a plain-English summary: a recommendation, the top risks, and the next moves. It's there to help you reason, not to overrule the funnel. It never changes a checkpoint or the status. You own the decision.

Exporting to Product Launch Simulator

The Product Launch Simulator xlsx export contains:

📋 Cerebro Raw DataPhraseSearch VolumePosition (Rank)B08D8CM3TJB07Y2VX9LP...hammock chair5,890125>306...Target ASIN's rank (optional column)One column per competitor (ASIN as header)Unranked cells = ">306"
This layout matches what Product Launch Simulator's built-in parser already understands. The internal sheet name (Cerebro Raw Data) is just the label the Simulator's importer looks for — it is not Helium10's Cerebro tool, and the data is not sourced from it. Competitor ASINs sit directly in column headers.
  • Phrase + Search Volume columns
  • Optional Position (Rank) column if you specified a target ASIN
  • One column per competitor ASIN, with the ASIN as the column header
  • Each cell holds the competitor's organic rank for that keyword, or >306 if unranked
  • Search Volume ≥ 350 filter applied at export time so it matches what Product Launch Simulator expects

Open Product Launch Simulator and drop the xlsx into the Step 1: Market Dominator upload box. The Simulator will auto-grade the niche (the same score you saw in this tool, give or take a small rounding) and tune the simulator's ramp / Advertising Cost of Sale / velocity assumptions accordingly.

Direct handoff fills more than the xlsx ever could.

Click Send to Product Launch Simulator from a results page and the simulator opens with the niche grade plus an auto-filled economics block (selling price, FBA fee, referral %, organic velocity at a 70 : 30 organic-to-paid split). When the scan is linked to a product in the funnel, the handoff also forwards the funnel work: cost of goods, the student's planned sell price, and the seasonality peak month. That means five inputs already filled when you arrive, not three.

What happens when an ASIN fails?

Sometimes Amazon refuses to return data for a specific ASIN (suppressed listing, regional restriction, very new product, etc.). The tool handles this gracefully:

10 ASINs submitted#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#108/10 fetched OK · 2 failed✓ Score computed using the 8 successful ASIN columns✓ Red callout shown above the results listing which ASINs failed and why⚠ Bucket math is calibrated for 10 columns — with fewer, the score is directionallycorrect but slightly less precise
Failed ASINs (suppressed listings, regional restrictions, transient API issues) don't kill the scan — the score is computed from whatever fetched successfully, with a clear callout naming the misses.
  • Successful ASINs are still used for the scoring.
  • Failed ASINs are listed in a red callout at the top of the results page.
  • The niche score is computed from whatever data we got. If 8/10 ASINs returned, the score uses 8 columns.
  • The bucket weight math is calibrated for 10 columns; with fewer the score is still directionally correct but slightly less precise.

What this tool is not

  • Not a guarantee. A green Market Dominator score is necessary but not sufficient for a successful launch. Product quality, supply chain, advertising competence, and timing all still matter.
  • Not a substitute for primary research. Run the score, then go look at the actual listings, read the reviews, check Helium10 / Jungle Scout for cross-validation, and talk to other sellers. The score points you at niches worth investigating — it doesn't replace the investigation.
  • Not an exact revenue forecaster. The estimated monthly revenue figures are directional. They're great for ranking competitors and gut-checking market size; they're not numbers to put in a business plan.
  • Not your account's compliance department. The barrier checks flag the common gates and likely requirements. Your own account's approvals, brand gating, and category permissions are yours to confirm in Seller Central.

Next steps